|
Paul Harvey
Comments on "The Passion" by Mel Gibson
The majority of the media are complaining about this movie. Now Paul Harvey
tells "The rest of the story" and David Limbaugh praises Gibson.
Most people would wait and see a movie before giving the reviews that
have been issued by the reporters trying to tell all of us what to believe.
Paul Harvey's words:
I really did not know what to expect. I was thrilled to have been invited
to a private viewing of Mel Gibson's film "The Passion," but
I had also read all the cautious articles and spin. I grew up in a Jewish
town and owe much of my own faith journey to the influence. I have a life
long, deeply held aversion to anything that might even indirectly encourage
any form of anti-Semitic thought, language or actions.
I arrived at the private viewing for "The Passion", held in
Washington DCand greeted some familiar faces. The environment was typically
Washingtonian, with people greeting you with a smile but seeming to look
beyond you, having an agenda beyond the words. The film was very briefly
introduced, without fanfare, and then the room darkened. From the gripping
opening scene in the Garden of Gethsemane, to the very human and tender
portrayal of the earthly ministry of Jesus, through the betrayal, the
arrest, the scourging, the way of the cross, the encounter with the thieves,
the surrender on the Cross, until the final scene in the empty tomb, this
was not simply a movie; it was an encounter, unlike anything I have ever
experienced.
In addition to being a masterpiece of film-making and an artistic triumph,
"The Passion" evoked more deep reflection, sorrow and emotional
reaction within me than anything since my wedding, my ordination or the
birth of my children. Frankly, I will never be the same. When the film
concluded, this "invitation only" gathering of "movers
and shakers" in Washington, DCwere shaking indeed, but this time
from sobbing. I am not sure there was a dry eye in the place. The crowd
that had been glad-handing before the film was now eerily silent. No one
could speak because words were woefully inadequate. We had experienced
a kind of art that is a rarity in life, the kind that makes heaven touch
earth.
One scene in the film has now been forever etched in my mind. A brutalized,
wounded Jesus was soon to fall again under the weight of the cross. His
mother had made her way along the Via Della Rosa. As she ran to him, she
flashed back to a memory of Jesus as a child, falling in the dirt road
outside of their home. Just as she reached to protect him from the fall,
she was now reaching to touch his wounded adult face. Jesus looked at
her with intensely probing and passionately loving eyes (and at all of
us through the screen) and said "Behold I make all things new."
These are words taken from the last Book of the New Testament, the Book
of Revelations. Suddenly, the purpose of the pain was so clear and the
wounds, that earlier in the film had been so difficult to see in His face,
His back, indeed all over His body, became intensely beautiful. They had
been borne voluntarily for love.
At the end of the film, after we had all had a chance to recover, a question
and answer period ensued. The unanimous praise for the film, from a rather
diverse crowd, was as astounding as the compliments were effusive. The
questions included the one question that seems to follow this film, even
though it has not yet even been released. "Why is this film considered
by some to be "anti-Semitic?" Frankly, having now experienced
(you do not "view" this film) "the Passion" it is
a question that is impossible to answer. A law professor whom I admire
sat in front of me. He raised his hand and responded "After watching
this film, I do not understand how anyone can insinuate that it even remotely
presents that the Jews killed Jesus. It doesn't." He continued "It
made me realize that my sins killed Jesus" I agree. There is not
a scintilla of anti-Semitism to be found anywhere in this powerful film.
If there were, I would be among the first to decry it. It faithfully tells
the Gospel story in a dramatically beautiful, sensitive and profoundly
engaging way.
Those who are alleging otherwise have either not seen the film or have
another agenda behind their protestations. This is not a "Christian"
film, in the sense that it will appeal only to those who identify themselves
as followers of Jesus Christ. It is a deeply human, beautiful story that
will deeply touch all men and women. It is a profound work of art. Yes,
its producer is a Catholic Christian and thankfully has remained faithful
to the Gospel text; if that is no longer acceptable behavior than we are
all in trouble. History demands that we remain faithful to the story and
Christians have a right to tell it. After all, we believe that it is the
greatest story ever told and that its message is for all men and women.
The greatest right is the right to hear the truth.
We would all be well advised to remember that the Gospel narratives to
which "The Passion" is so faithful were written by Jewish men
who followed a Jewish Rabbi whose life and teaching have forever changed
the history of the world. The problem is not the message but those who
have distorted it and used it for hate rather than love. The solution
is not to censor the message, but rather to promote the kind of gift of
love that is Mel Gibson's filmmaking masterpiece, "The Passion."
It should be seen by as many people as possible. I intend to do everything
I can to make sure that is the case. I am passionate about "The Passion."
You will be as well. Don't miss it!
|
|